Active older people
resemble much younger people physiologically, according to a new study
of the effects of exercise on aging. The findings suggest that many of
our expectations about the inevitability of physical decline with
advancing years may be incorrect and that how we age is, to a large
degree, up to us.
Aging remains a
surprisingly mysterious process. A wealth of past scientific research
has shown that many bodily and cellular processes change in undesirable
ways as we grow older. But science has not been able to establish
definitively whether such changes result primarily from the passage of
time — in which case they are inevitable for anyone with birthdays — or
result at least in part from lifestyle, meaning that they are mutable.
This conundrum is
particularly true in terms of inactivity. Older people tend to be quite
sedentary nowadays, and being sedentary affects health, making it
difficult to separate the effects of not moving from those of getting
older.
In the new study, which was published this week in The Journal of Physiology, scientists at King’s College London and the University of Birmingham in England decided to use a different approach.
They removed inactivity as a factor in their study of aging by looking at the health of older people who move quite a bit.
“We wanted to
understand what happens to the functioning of our bodies as we get older
if we take the best-case scenario,” said Stephen Harridge, senior
author of the study and director of the Centre of Human and Aerospace
Physiological Sciences at King’s College London.
To accomplish that
goal, the scientists recruited 85 men and 41 women aged between 55 and
79 who bicycle regularly. The volunteers were all serious recreational
riders but not competitive athletes. The men had to be able to ride at
least 62 miles in six and a half hours and the women 37 miles in five
and a half hours, benchmarks typical of a high degree of fitness in
older people.
The scientists then
ran each volunteer through a large array of physical and cognitive
tests. The scientists determined each cyclist’s endurance capacity,
muscular mass and strength, pedaling power, metabolic health, balance,
memory function, bone density and reflexes. They also had the volunteers
complete the so-called Timed Up and Go test, during which someone
stands up from a chair without using his or her arms, briskly walks
about 10 feet, turns, walks back and sits down again.
The researchers
compared the results of cyclists in the study against each other and
also against standard benchmarks of supposedly normal aging. If a
particular test’s numbers were similar among the cyclists of all ages,
the researchers considered, then that measure would seem to be more
dependent on activity than on age.
As it turned out, the
cyclists did not show their age. On almost all measures, their physical
functioning remained fairly stable across the decades and was much
closer to that of young adults than of people their age. As a group,
even the oldest cyclists had younger people’s levels of balance,
reflexes, metabolic health and memory ability.
And their Timed Up and
Go results were exemplary. Many older people require at least 7 seconds
to complete the task, with those requiring 9 or 10 seconds considered
to be on the cusp of frailty, Dr. Harridge said. But even the oldest
cyclists in this study averaged barely 5 seconds for the walk, which is
“well within the norm reported for healthy young adults,” the study
authors write.
Some aspects of aging
did, however, prove to be ineluctable. The oldest cyclists had less
muscular power and mass than those in their 50s and early 60s and
considerably lower overall aerobic capacities. Age does seem to reduce
our endurance and strength to some extent, Dr. Harridge said, even if we
exercise.
But even so, both of
those measures were higher among the oldest cyclists than would be
considered average among people aged 70 or above.
All in all, the numbers suggest that aging is simply different in the active.
“If you gave this
dataset to a clinician and asked him to predict the age” of one of the
cyclists based on his or her test results, Dr. Harridge said, “it would
be impossible.” On paper, they all look young.
Of course, this study
is based on a single snapshot of an unusual group of older adults, Dr.
Harridge said. He and his colleagues plan to retest their volunteers in
five and 10 years, which will provide better information about the
ongoing effects of exercise on aging.
But even in advance of
those results, said Dr. Harridge, himself almost 50 and an avid
cyclist, this study shows that “being physically active makes your body
function on the inside more like a young person’s.”
No comments:
Post a Comment